2. I regret however to point out to you that, subsequent to the date of Carnarvon's despatch no. 18 of 18 February 1876, Mr. Marsh entered the service of Hongkong. He does not appear to be entitled to the privilege of remitting at 4/2 the dollar.
I am not aware that it has ever been decided that the above despatch should not apply to officers in Hongkong who, in the words of your despatch no.186 of 13th August last, paragraph 4, have been "for many years in the service".
The Auditor, however, might frown upon Officers writing from other parts of the Empire, where they may have already exercised the privilege of remittance; but I may mention that in the somewhat similar case of M. C. C. Smith, who was transferred to the Straits Settlements for "Hauling", it was decided that he should lose the special privilege of remitting at par as he had received substantial promotion.
3. I am of opinion therefore that Mr. Marsh should not be allowed the privilege in future, and should...
CO 129/185 420/76
Min. 76419
Phys...
becomes2. I regret however to point out to
you that,
A
A-7
M.
Marsh entered the service
of Hongkong subsequently
to the date of Carnarvon's despatch no.
18 of 18 February 1876,
he does not appear to be entitled to the privilege
of remitting at 4/2 the
dollar.
I
am not aware
that it has ever been decided
Madden officer that the above despatch should not
The
have after entering
apply on to officers in Hongkong
who in the words of your despatch no.186 of 13th August last, par. 4) have been for many years in the service;
Car Sor 175
CO129/185 420/76
Sov 76419
Phys
I
He
"frown in other parts of the Empire, where they may have
already exercised the privilege of
remittance" ; but I may mention,
that in
the somewhat similar
Case of M. C. C. Smith,
who
was
transferred to
the Straits Settlements for
Hauling,
it was decided
that he should lose the
special privilege of
remitting at par as he had received substantial
promotion.
3. I am of opinion
therefore
that M. Marsh
should not be allowed the
privilege in future, and
should
Here is the corrected version in HTML format:2. I regret however to point out to you that, subsequent to the date of Carnarvon's despatch no. 18 of 18 February 1876, M. Marsh entered the service of Hongkong. He does not appear to be entitled to the privilege of remitting at 4/2 the dollar.
I am not aware that it has ever been decided that the above despatch should not apply to officers in Hongkong who, in the words of your despatch no.186 of 13th August last, par. 4) have been for many years in the service;
The Auditor might "frown" upon Officers writing from other parts of the Empire, where they may have already exercised the privilege of remittance; but I may mention that in the somewhat similar case of M. C. C. Smith, who was transferred to the Straits Settlements for Hauling, it was decided that he should lose the special privilege of remitting at par as he had received substantial promotion.
3. I am of opinion therefore that M. Marsh should not be allowed the privilege in future, and should...
CO129/185 420/76
Min. 76419
2. Iregret however to point out to
sferom you that,
A
A-7
M.
Marsh cutered the service
of Hongkong subsequently
the Earl of
to the date of Carnarvon's despatch u
18 of 18 February 1876,
ho.
he does not appear to be entitted to the privilege
of remitting at 4/2 the
dollar.
I
am not aware
When
that it has ever been decided
Madden officer that the above despatch should not
The
have after entering
apply on to officers in Hongkung
who in the words of your despatch tudas paganahadat
no.186 of 13th August Cast; par. 4) the frontfood raccom have been for enden.
many gear in the
service
the
Car
Sor 175 420/76
Sov
76419
Phys
I
He
{
ery
"frown in other parts of thes Officernwiteringither 80 Empire, where they may have
already exercised the privilege of
remittance" ; but I may mention,
Auditor, but
Perhaps Pechaft un might
bet min of this I
See
page.
that ins
the somewhat similar
Case of M. C. C. Smith,
who
was
transferred to
the Straits Tittlements for
Haughing,
the
it was decided
that he should love the
special privilege of
remitting at par as he had received substantial.
promotion.
3. Aless Jam of opinion
therefre
that M. Marsh
should not be allowed the
privilege in future, and
should
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.